Archive

Archive for the ‘Rights’ Category

The Myth of Drug Control

October 3rd, 2009 Greg No comments

I had a friend send me a link which can be viewed at the end of the article. It was his justification as to why drugs should be illegal. Now, this is an interesting topic, and I’ve only recently begun to dig into it. However, I will say that I’m neutral on this topic at this time. I’m neither for or against making drugs legal. I see benefits on both sides, and thus can not make an informed decision. However, err on the side of caution, I’d be willing to go along with legalization to support the rights of the individual. Now, this doesn’t mean I approve of reckless drug use or driving while under the influence of anything. Moderation is the key to life, and infringing on someone else’s rights to get your high on is not, and should not be tolerated.

Read more…

Categories: Politics, Rights Tags: ,

California is racist!

September 22nd, 2009 Greg No comments

Scary accusation right?

Racism is gone now that we have a president of color, right?

Well, I’m talking about handguns again. Currently California has a list, a roster, known as the “safe gun list”. This list is comprised of handguns from different manufacturers that have sent the state two guns, ammo, and a fee so the state can test their “safeness”. So, what’s a safe handgun? Who knows! However, to me a safe handgun is one that doesn’t blow up when I shoot it. So, the term “safe” is relative and open for interpretation. In California they say that any gun manufacturer who doesn’t pay the fee and have features like a “magazine disconnect” or “loaded chamber indicator” can’t sell their guns in California because they are unsafe.

Also, the law enforcement in California are immune from this law. They may purchase “unsafe” handguns if they like. In fact, they can even sell their “unsafe” handguns to citizens after they purchase them. So, what exactly does this have to do with racism you’re wondering?

I’m claiming CA is racist because they discriminate between colors of handguns. I can buy a Kimber that’s finished as stainless steel, but not blued for the same caliber. I can buy a gun that’s right handed, but not left handed. Of course, if they were on the list, then I could buy them, right? Exactly, I could. But why should the same gun be listed twice on the list just because it’s a different color? That’s like saying you can only sell red Volkswagen Jetta TDI’s in CA because the blue ones pollute too much.

There’s actually a lawsuit against the state right now. Tying up more money of yours and mine. The state will fight tooth and nail to keep their draconian laws, however we, the law abiding citizens, actually appear to be able to win. We’re are starting to win the good fight. We’re slowly getting our rights back. Even the ACLU is starting to stand up for people who have had their rights violated when exercising their second amendment right to keep and bear arms.

Categories: Rights Tags: , , ,

California Assembly Bill 962

September 22nd, 2009 Greg No comments

Every day I wake up, and I have a goal. A goal that I can learn from yesterday and apply it to the present. After all, if one can not learn from their mistakes, they’re bound to repeat them. Well, that’s just what our appropriations committee and our senate here in California did. They went through and rubber stamped a bill that’s so absurd that everyone needs to be aware of it.

Ok, so California is a Liberal state (just a little, right?), and we have some terrible gun laws already on the books to “save the children”. However, do we need another fiscally negative bill to be passed given this economy and our current status as being BANKRUPT? Yeah, that’s right. AB962 is fiscally negative. It’s going to take money from other funds to support itself. It’s also going to limit the amount of sales tax the state takes in from Internet and mail orders. It will also have the effect of causing sport and recreation shooters to go to the range even less, because ammunition will be harder to get, more expensive, and tiresome to purchase.

So, what are the details you’re asking? If you want to read the proposed laws you can do so here. However I’ll give you a rundown.

First, all purchases of ammunition would be illegal to felons. Gee, it’s already against the law for felons to possess ammunition. Guess we need a double law on this one so they’ll think twice about doing it.

Second, all orders would need to be face-to-face. Which doesn’t sounds bad at first, however many dealers outside of CA are already not selling guns, parts, accessories to CA because of the restrictive laws. This would just add to it making them not sell ammunition either. Let’s also not forget that felons and gang members aren’t law abiding, so what do they care?

Third, it would require licensed “ammunition dealers” (yes, yet another restriction), to finger print and ID the purchaser. Now, you already have to show ID if you look under age, just like tobacco and alcohol. However now they’ll have a file on what you buy, how often, and in what quantities. So if you purchase some ammo, and some banger shoots up the town, you may be a suspect if your purchase matches what was used. Remember, innocent until proven guilty, right?

Fourth, there was limits on quantities that were able to be transfered if you weren’t a dealer. However those were struck down for being obscenely ridiculous.

Fifth, there is not money to enforce this. The state is broke… Why are we trying to pass laws that will cause the state to spend more money at a time like this? Violent crime is at an all time low across the country, yet we’re still looking to pass laws like this for no apparent reason.

Sixth, criminals don’t follow the law. If they did we wouldn’t have a drug problem. What do they care if we add another law? All we’re doing is disarming law abiding citizens. We have rights, and we need to stand up for them. If we lay down our guns, who’s going to stop the lawmakers from handing us muzzles and forcing us to wear them? We can’t let them win, we need to be in control of lawmakers, not the other way around. They work for us!

This isn’t about Republicans or Democrats. In fact you won’t see me siding with anyone on this blog. We need to enforce our constitution and hold everyone accountable. Elected officials work for us. They should fear us, not us fear them. We’re going backwards with our country and state. If our founding fathers could see us now they’d know they failed, which brings tears to my eyes.

If you would like to read more on this, you can read an analogy by other senators here.

Categories: Politics, Rights Tags: , ,